|
"Vulnerability Assessment:
Effective Education For the Unexpected"
|
Gary Novak, Johns Hopkins
University
Colleen Deitrich, Synectic
Resources Inc.
Rick Deitrich,
Synectic Resources Inc.
|
Contents: Vulnerability Assessment - Hazardous
Materials - Research Animals - Facilities
Effective Education - Interactive
Training
Vulnerability Assessment
|
Hazard Identification:
• Geographical Impact
• Hazardous Materials
• Facilities
• Research Animals
|
 |
As we have heard from those who have experienced disasters at their
facility locations, we can draw some important conclusions with respect
to specific factors that will help us identify specific hazards. Identification
of these hazards provide us with important information as we conduct
a vulnerability assessment.

We have seen the impact of geographical location with respect to natural
disasters that include floods, earthquake, tornadoes, winter storms,
hurricanes and tropical storms.
WEB Information Access:
|

Historic hurricanes |

Visit this site: www.esri.com/hazards/
|
Historic tornadoes |
Historical data can provide us with valuable information
with respect to the areas most vulnerable to hurricanes and tornadoes.
FEMA and ESRI have formed a National Partnership in part aimed at
providing multi-hazard maps and information to U.S. residents, business
owners, schools, community groups, and local governments via the
Internet at http://www.esri.com/hazards/ The information provided
in this web site is intended to assist in building disaster resistant
communities across the country by sharing geographic knowledge about
local hazards. |
Hazardous Materials:
• Chemical
• Microbiological agents
• Radioactive materials
• Biological Waste |
 |
 |
Vulnerability Assessment
Hazardous materials that are used within the facility must be stored
and secured in areas that can be contained based on a risk assessment
of potential events, earthquake, hurricane, tornado, etc. Emergency
procedures for containment and clean-up of hazardous materials requires
immediate response in the event of spills or release of hazardous
materials, |
Research Animals:
• Water: Decontamination
• Feed: Supply and storage
• Disease: Diagnosis and Disinfection
• Security: Access |
 |
The vulnerability of research animals presents unique challenges when
developing a disaster plan. In comparison to research data which can
be backed-up and stored offsite or evacuation plans for personnel, without
advanced notice animals cannot be relocated easily. The survivability
of the animals will be dependent on providing water, feed, and ventilation
during the disaster. Security issues and the potential spread of disease
must also be taken into consideration.
Facilities:
• Ventilation
• Lighting
• Plumbing |
 |
Sump Pump Failure
 |
Location: Below grade animal facility
Rack washer pit
Time of day:
Late afternoon
Damage:
Entire sub-basement level,
3 inches of waste water
- Facility contamination
- Economic loss??? |
Disaster planning may overlook unpredictable and what may be thought
of as unlikely events. Three events occurred that at first glance may
appear to be minor but could have a major effect on research animals.
These three events point to several possible occurrences that may be
overlooked in developing a research animal facility disaster plan. Facility
managers and directors must carefully evaluate not only the primary
hazards such as flood, fire and storms, but must also include facility
events and failures in their vulnerability and risk assessment.
The first event occurred when the primary and secondary sump pumps that
removed waste water from the below grade animal facility failed. This
pump failure occurred in the late afternoon. There was no alarm system
and only when the cage wash staff noticed that water was filling the
rack washer pit did we suspect that something was wrong. Since the sump
pumps removed waste water from all areas on this below grade floor the
water was filling the pit rapidly. Before the pumps could be repaired
the entire sub-basement animal facility was covered in three inches
of waste water. Fortunately, the water did not result in any loss of
animals but equipment and supplies were contaminated and the entire
area had to be decontaminated.
Pipe Leak
Location:
Drain line from Radiology film
processor above ceiling
Time of day:
Sometime between 4:30 pm and 8:00 am
the following morning
Damage:
Five cages of transgenic mice
- Foundation colony
- Economic loss???? |
 |
Sometime between 4:30 PM and 8:00 AM the following morning a drain
line from a film processor located on the floor above the animal facility
failed. This pipe was located above the ceiling of a mouse room. Film
processors operate continuously and water is always flowing through
the unit. Apparently the drain pipe was corroded by the waste film processing
chemicals and developed a leak. This leak was not discovered until the
following morning. Unfortunately this drain pipe was located directly
above a mouse rack housing a breeding colony of transgenic mice. Several
cages were flooded and the mice drowned. The flooded cages contained
the founders for this line. The economic loss for the founders was $3,500.00
for the cost of the transgenic mice, but this cost does not include
the lost research time and effort that went into developing this colony.
Do you know what is above the ceilings in your animal rooms? Plumbing
fixtures located behind walls and above ceilings should be included
in your vulnerability and risk assessment.
Power Failure
Location:
Research Building
Three incoming power feeder circuits
Overload and failure of transfer switch
Time of day:
Early morning 8:00 am
Early summer
Damage:
Emergency power generator operational
for life support only.
- Corridor lighting only
- No HVAC
- No loss of animals: room temperature increase
- Low temperature refrigeration equipment
- Economic loss????
The third occurrence was a very unlikely and unpredictable event. The
research building is located on the hospital lot. Because life support
is a critical issues in a hospital environment, this building was supplied
with three incoming power feeder circuits. All three incoming lines
would have to fail before all power was lost. If one line failed, power
was redirected by a transfer switch to the next incoming line. In order
for all power to be lost, all three lines would have to fail at the
same time. A very unlikely event. A very unusual event occurred. The
transfer switch overloaded and caught fire early on a summer day. The
emergency power generators operated but provided power for hospital
life support functions only. The animal facility had emergency corridor
lighting only. The HVAC system was not operational. The power failure
lasted for 10 hours. Temperatures in the animal rooms increased and
there was no loss of animals. The major loss resulted from loss of power
to low temperature refrigeration equipment. Several researchers lost
all samples contained in the freezers that lost power.
Many rodent facilities use individually ventilated cage systems. Are
these units supplied by emergency power? How long can the animals survive
if power is lost? Is the facility HVAC system on emergency power? Are
critical pieces of equipment on emergency power circuits? These systems
need to be evaluated and included in your vulnerability and risk assessment.
Principle: The process of planning is more important
than the written document that results.
People internalize the information in the process of planning.
The process of planning is as important as the written document that
results! As a disaster plan is being created, the individuals involved
in the planning will internalize the information through the brainstorming
process.

Effective
Education
The key to implementing a disaster plan will involve effective
education and training of personnel. As important as a disaster plan
is, it can give us the illusion that we are prepared for a disaster.
This is called the “Paper Plan Syndrome”. It is essential
that a disaster plan be tied to an effective training program.

Researchers have found that everyone has a primary learning
style. The seven we will look at are interpersonal, logical-mathematical,
linguistic-verbal, musical, bodily-kinesthetic, intra-personal and visual-spatial.
The first learning style referred to as the interpersonal learner, is
an individual who enjoys group discussions and interactions with an
instructor. The logical-mathematical learner enjoys puzzles and number
problems. Linguistic-verbal learners have the ability to sit through
an hour of lecture and retain most of the information. Musical learners
love relating new information to music. Most people learned their ABC’s
through singing and many teenagers listen to CD’s and radios as
they study! Bodily-kinesthetic learners like hands-on experiences and
using their bodies to experience new information. Intra-personal learners
tend to learn on their own, preferring self-instruction over group learning.
The new on-line courses offered by many colleges are engaging to these
students. Visual-spatial learners need to see what is being taught in
pictures, graphs, video or in person.
The three learning styles that most people prefer are linguistic-verbal,
12-18%, bodily-kinesthetic, 18-30% and visual-spatial, 60-72%. Developing
training programs appealing to these learning styles will not only engage
the learners but improve the retention of the material.
Blended Learning Opportunities
Blended learning opportunities, a method of using several learning
strategies to meet all learning styles, is important in developing an
effective training program. By using instructor led learning, hands-on
experience, computer based training and mentoring together, you will
increase the success of your training program.
Instructor led learning, one common in most training experiences, is
important for direct delivery of information and allows for interaction
with students and instructors. Hands-on experiences are invaluable in
training of specific task related information. Computer based training
is quite effective for use both in preview as well as review of training
material. Mentoring is a process where someone further along in a particular
position is willing to guide and help new or less experienced co-workers.
This can be effective for both the trainee as well as the mentor. These
four training methods, blended together, will improve the effectiveness
of your training program.
Learner Centered Training

Effective training will be learner centered. This means it must be
flexible, it must accommodate different learning styles and it should
actively involve the individual. Other crucial aspects are that it must
motivate the individual, it must be relevant to the job task at hand
and the learner should be responsible for the material covered. Some
form of assessment should be included to insure the information has
been internalized.
Instructor led training, hands-on training and self-paced training such
as computer based training are significant tools when they are learner
centered.
Interactive Training:
• Gain the learners attention with a visual
• Inform the learner of the objectives
• Stimulate recall of prior experience
• Use graphics, photos and video
• Present instruction in small steps
• Involve employees through active participation
• Assess performance
Interactive training is self-paced, allows individuals to participate
in the learning process and is only effective when you employ good educational
strategies. By gaining the learners attention immediately with a visual,
you have increased their interest. Informing the learner of the objectives
or goals of the training allows the learner to understand the necessity
of the training. If the learner has had prior experience of the subject,
bringing that to the forefront can help increase the understanding of
the subject. Using graphics, photos and video will enhance and speed
up the training process. A picture is worth a thousand words and videos
of a procedure can be invaluable. Presenting instruction in small steps
helps the learner grasp complicated procedures. This is called “chunking”
and is important in task-related material. Active participation is important
to internalize the training. Assessment is necessary after small “chunks”
of information to be sure the material presented has been retained.
Effective interactive training will appeal to all the learning styles
and will easily fit into a blended learning program.
|
Emergency
Building water supply cut off
|
Response
|
Condition: Water main brake
1. Racks with automatic watering
2. Possible Contamination of
water supply following repair.
3. No available water source for
filling bottles or reserve water
source. |
1. Supply cages with sterile
water gel package.
2. Fold package
3. Carefully cut a 2” opening
4. Place opening down in wire
lid pocket or in the cage. |
 |
|
For example, here we have an emergency condition during a building
water supply cut off due to a water main brake. The training presentation
outlines the condition, the immediate risk to the animals and the response
that is to be taken. The instructions are clear with visuals showing
how to respond to the emergency situation. In addition to using text
and visuals, some training areas can include interactive audio and video
if needed.
Disaster Training Development
• Instructional Design
• Simulation
• Evaluation
• Implementation
• Practice +++++
Disaster training, to be effective, should include the following five
elements. Instructional design based on the seven learning styles, a
walk through simulation of the disaster plan, evaluation of the simulation,
implementation of the plan after making necessary changes and practice,
practice, practice. Disaster simulation helps identify any changes that
need to be made to the plan and practice allows individuals to internalize
the plan. By developing a complete disaster training program, you will
empower your people with the confidence needed to face any unexpected
event.
(Return to top)
Real Life Disasters
- Disaster Planning - Facility
Planning - Assets Protection - Web
Links - Home
copyright 2003